Publication:

Efficacy of Esketamine Augmentation in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis

dash.affiliation.otherHarvard Medical Schoolen_US
dash.licenseMETA_ONLY
dash.source.issue4en_US
dash.source.volume81en_US
dash.waiver2019-12-16
dc.contributor.authorPapakostas, George
dc.contributor.authorChaaya Salloum, Naji
dc.contributor.authorHock, Rebecca
dc.contributor.authorJha, Manish K.
dc.contributor.authorMurrough, James W.
dc.contributor.authorMathew, Sanjay J.
dc.contributor.authorIosifescu, Daniel V.
dc.contributor.authorFava, Maurizio
dc.date.accessioned2023-06-29T12:11:50Z
dc.date.available2023-06-29T12:11:50Z
dc.date.issued2020-05-26
dc.description.abstractObjective: Esketamine, the s-enantiomer of ketamine, was recently approved as a rapid-acting intranasal therapy for depression and is currently under development for suicidality. The authors sought to determine the efficacy of adjunctive intranasal esketamine in major depressive disorder (MDD). Data Sources: A systematic search of Pubmed/Medline was conducted up to January 2019, in addition to abstracts of major psychiatric meetings held since 2010. Where necessary, authors and/or study sponsors were contacted in order to obtain a copy of the presentation as well as any pertinent study details. Study Selection: 241 study abstracts were initially identified and reviewed. Selected studies were randomized, double-blind clinical trials comparing adjunctive intranasal esketamine to adjunctive placebo for MDD. Data Extration: Data were extracted independently by two of the authors. A random effects model was used to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) between esketamine and placebo (intranasal saline) in the MADRS score change from baseline to endpoint, serving as the primary outcome of the study. Results: Five trials with 774 patients were pooled. Adjunctive esketamine was significantly more effective than placebo for MADRS score change, response, and remission (N=774, SMD = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.24 - 0.49, p < .0001; response: RR = 1.40, 95% CI: 1.22 - 1.61, p < .0001; remission: RR = 1.45, 95% CI: 1.20 - 1.75, p < .0001). Results remained statistically significant regardless of differences in the study sample, fixed vs. new/optimized baseline antidepressants, or duration of the study. Conclusions: Adjunctive intranasal esketamine for patients with MDD who are either treatment-resistant or acutely suicidal appears to be an effective treatment strategy.en_US
dc.description.versionAccepted Manuscripten_US
dc.identifier.citationPapakostas, George, Naji C. Salloum, Rebecca S. Hock, Manish K. Jha, James W. Murrough, Sanjay J. Mathew, Dan Iosifescu, and Maurizio Fava. 2020. “Efficacy of Esketamine Augmentation in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysis.” The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 81 (4).en_US
dc.identifier.doi10.4088/jcp.19r12889
dc.identifier.issn1555-2101en_US
dc.identifier.urihttps://nrs.harvard.edu/URN-3:HUL.INSTREPOS:37376286*
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherPhysicians Postgraduate Press, Incen_US
dc.relation.isversionofhttps://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.19r12889en_US
dc.relation.journalThe Journal of Clinical Psychiatryen_US
dc.relation.projectJournal of Clinical Psychiatryen_US
dc.subjectPsychiatry and Mental healthen_US
dc.titleEfficacy of Esketamine Augmentation in Major Depressive Disorder: A Meta-Analysisen_US
dc.title.alternativeA Meta-Analysis
dc.typeJournal Articleen_US
dspace.entity.typePublication
oaire.licenseConditionMETA_ONLY
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationfb264dc3-4cf9-41cc-bff3-8e9192037715
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7231e7b9-188e-4051-9a10-825ed1c0d575
relation.isAuthorOfPublicationf38410e8-3941-4b8d-b5ff-022688be2459
relation.isAuthorOfPublication7877678e-e953-4071-97c4-5979189906e0
relation.isAuthorOfPublication.latestForDiscoveryfb264dc3-4cf9-41cc-bff3-8e9192037715

Open/View Files

Original bundle

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Loading...
Thumbnail Image
Name:
13330_esketamine-augmentation-in-major-depressive-disorder.pdf
Size:
647.21 KB
Format:
Adobe Portable Document Format
Description: